Philadelphia



 Philadelphia (1993) 

Successful lawyer Andy Beckett (Tom Hanks) receives a once in a life time promotion from his law firm. Unbeknownst to his boss, he is hiding his sexual orientation and the fact he has been diagnosed with AIDS. After being fired, Andy approaches several lawyers pleading his case for discrimination but none will represent him. Until he reaches out to small-time lawyer Joe Miller (Denzel Washington), who despite his fear of aids and homosexuals, decides to be Andy’s lawyer. As Andy’s condition worsens, a lengthy court case draws out, where Andy fights for his rights in a system and a city unwelcoming of the growing AIDS pandemic and homosexuality.

In the 1980’s, we began to understand more about AIDS, and many cases were recorded around the world. With it’s lethal, and cunning hold over the victim’s body, the fear of the disease ran rampant. Most people didn’t understand exactly how it was passed on and contracted, and believed that if someone infected with the virus even shook their hands, they would catch AIDS themselves. The issue was front and centre in the media in the early 90’s, especially with NBA basketball player Magic Johnson revealing he had the virus, and continued to play basketball and live his life.

This certainly helped alleviate the fear of the virus being transmitted. However, homophobia was still a fear as strong as the fear of AIDS itself. Stories were starting to come forward of people being infected, and this being the catalyst for employers and business to get rid of the person as soon as possible. Someone had to take a stand against persecution and corruption and the basis for the film is touted to come from the story of two such men; both lawyers who were fired once their employers discovered they had AIDS.  


 Philadelphia is a film that isn’t short of controversy. In an interesting move, the story chooses to set itself in the city that may not be a big player on the world stage, but has a culture and community that is uniquely its own. The word “Philadelphia” was on everyone’s mouth in 1993, being the title of a critically and commercially successful movie, a number one song by Bruce Springsteen, and giving Tom Hanks his first Oscar for Best Actor. He’d follow this up a year later with another landmark performance in “Forrest Gump”, giving him back-to-back accolades for his work.    

The film is, first and foremost, a story about a man carrying a heavy burden, and his fight for justice in a corrupt legal system he himself once worked in. And it also isn’t afraid to tackle the issues of the time, in a totally candid and honest way. It explores the lives of homosexuals, their vulnerability to contracting AIDS and the untimely death many of them can meet as a result. How all of that can label a person in the eyes of society is damaging, and this is personified in the film by the key characters and the people of Philadelphia themselves, who play a significant role in shedding light on the fears at play. It was very admirable for the Academy to recognise the film, given Hollywood can be known for its homophobia, and giving Tom Hanks a well-deserved Oscar for his performance was a true acknowledgment. His portrayal on screen is incredible, as you will see a man who goes from having the world at his feet, to hiding a secret he feels he can’t share, then being front and centre in a legal case where everyone has an opinion about it.

The film may challenge some of your own notions and fears, and is at a times a confronting viewing experience. You will feel angered, ashamed, shocked and dismayed.  It’s in the key supporting role of Joe Miller, where Denzel Washington shines as usual, and symbolizes the various fears being explored. He goes through a major transformation of his own, from a layer usually representing guys who broke their legs at work, to the centre of the biggest court case in Philadelphia, and perhaps the country.


Philadelphia is a film as relevant now as it was almost thirty years ago. The issues and fears it explores are still evident today, even if our understanding and acceptance has grown in recent times. Perhaps what hasn’t changed is how large, corporate bodies can treat the individual on a range of issues. But in the case of Philadelphia, it’s an inspiring, although ultimately heart-wrenching tale, of one such individual taking on the system and not giving up, even with his own health at stake. And in his journey, he significantly impacts the lives of everyone around him, who despite their fears, prejudices and misunderstandings are all reminded that humanity and compassion will always prevail, in the real world and the courtroom.  







No comments:

Post a Comment